<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Verizon (or whoever your ISP is) be paid twice/thrice for you to access Google?</title>
	<link>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/</link>
	<description>The WBB is a group blog written by the Willis brothers and their friends. We talk about eGovernment, Inspirado, Lifehacks and Fire Fighting.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20377</link>
		<author>kent</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20377</guid>
					<description>The closet Capitalist in me disagrees.  AS LONG AS THERE'S REAL COMPETITION for what they provide, they can charge twice, three times, whatever.  They made the investment.  If they overcharge, they lose business to cable companies, power lines, wireless, etc.
If you buy shares of a stock in the hope of making a return of 20% per year (high hopes, indeed), and some unforeseen event occurs making it possible for your return to be 40% instead, you don't have to return your dividend checks to the company.  You just hope this good fortune offsets some other investment that didn't go as well as planned.  The phone companies made speculative investments in the "pipes," and for a couple of years it was clear that they had overinvested, had overcapacity, and had to eat the cost of those investments.  They almost certainly did not expect Google to become a competitor, but fortuitously they did, and AS LONG AS THERE'S COMPETITION for the service they provide, they can charge everybody in sight as far as I'm concerned.  If Google doesn't like their price - or their competion's - they can install their own pipes...or threaten to do so!  And anyone jealous of SBC's returns, can simply invest in SBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The closet Capitalist in me disagrees.  AS LONG AS THERE&#8217;S REAL COMPETITION for what they provide, they can charge twice, three times, whatever.  They made the investment.  If they overcharge, they lose business to cable companies, power lines, wireless, etc.<br />
If you buy shares of a stock in the hope of making a return of 20% per year (high hopes, indeed), and some unforeseen event occurs making it possible for your return to be 40% instead, you don&#8217;t have to return your dividend checks to the company.  You just hope this good fortune offsets some other investment that didn&#8217;t go as well as planned.  The phone companies made speculative investments in the &#8220;pipes,&#8221; and for a couple of years it was clear that they had overinvested, had overcapacity, and had to eat the cost of those investments.  They almost certainly did not expect Google to become a competitor, but fortuitously they did, and AS LONG AS THERE&#8217;S COMPETITION for the service they provide, they can charge everybody in sight as far as I&#8217;m concerned.  If Google doesn&#8217;t like their price - or their competion&#8217;s - they can install their own pipes&#8230;or threaten to do so!  And anyone jealous of SBC&#8217;s returns, can simply invest in SBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20379</link>
		<author>chris</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20379</guid>
					<description>"they can install their own pipes…or threaten to do so! And anyone jealous of SBC’s returns, can simply invest in SBC. "

yes kent
now that is how the leaders of this country should think!!! or maybe they already do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they can install their own pipes…or threaten to do so! And anyone jealous of SBC’s returns, can simply invest in SBC. &#8221;</p>
<p>yes kent<br />
now that is how the leaders of this country should think!!! or maybe they already do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChronoFish</title>
		<link>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20380</link>
		<author>ChronoFish</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20380</guid>
					<description>Capitolism is good and I am not advocating against it.  Historically the phone/network system has always been treated special - much like the airline industry.  Sometimes they are a "utility" sometimes they are "private corporation".  It all depends on the situation (and side) you want to argue at the time (See &lt;a href="http://www.fcc.gov/911/enhanced/" rel="nofollow"&gt;e911&lt;/a&gt;).

The problem has always been that large service providers don't want competition AND don't want government oversite.  You can't (not) have both.

I do believe that the "market" will reject the notion of private "selective service" networks - that's pre-Internet thinking (think Compuserv, Prodigy, old AOL, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capitolism is good and I am not advocating against it.  Historically the phone/network system has always been treated special - much like the airline industry.  Sometimes they are a &#8220;utility&#8221; sometimes they are &#8220;private corporation&#8221;.  It all depends on the situation (and side) you want to argue at the time (See <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/911/enhanced/" rel="nofollow">e911</a>).</p>
<p>The problem has always been that large service providers don&#8217;t want competition AND don&#8217;t want government oversite.  You can&#8217;t (not) have both.</p>
<p>I do believe that the &#8220;market&#8221; will reject the notion of private &#8220;selective service&#8221; networks - that&#8217;s pre-Internet thinking (think Compuserv, Prodigy, old AOL, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20381</link>
		<author>kent</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20381</guid>
					<description>Don't get carried away, Chris.  I'm talking about free market capitalism, not cronyism, tax cuts for the rich, petty small-mindedness, lies and corruption.  You'll know we have leaders when we're actually moving forward, and in a direction that the citizenship supports.
BTW, where's my dolphin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get carried away, Chris.  I&#8217;m talking about free market capitalism, not cronyism, tax cuts for the rich, petty small-mindedness, lies and corruption.  You&#8217;ll know we have leaders when we&#8217;re actually moving forward, and in a direction that the citizenship supports.<br />
BTW, where&#8217;s my dolphin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20382</link>
		<author>chris</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20382</guid>
					<description>kent
cross your fingers,
if the weather gods permit i will be fishing friday night returning late saturday. 
cross your fingers...think fishy.
chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kent<br />
cross your fingers,<br />
if the weather gods permit i will be fishing friday night returning late saturday.<br />
cross your fingers&#8230;think fishy.<br />
chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nav</title>
		<link>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20388</link>
		<author>nav</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willisbros.net/blog/2005/10/31/should-verizon-or-whoever-your-isp-is-be-paid-twice-for-you-to-access-google/#comment-20388</guid>
					<description>I want one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
